Ellen Rescinds Kim Burrell’s Invitation to Appear on Show and The Culture of Fake Inclusion

By Lena Fields-Arnold

The Yahoo Headline read “Kim Burrell Will Not Appear on Show.”

Apparently she was booted off a scheduled appearance on Ellen for preaching an “anti-gay” sermon the weekend prior at her church.

According to yahoo news “the singer faced a backlash after a YouTube video posted on Dec. 30 showed Burrell delivering a sermon at the Love & Liberty Fellowship Church in Houston, where she is a senior pastor. In the clip, Burrell condemns homosexuality as “perverted” and an “embarrassment.”

After a “flood of tweets and a Change.org petition that garnered more than 5000 supporters,” denouncing Burrell’s comments Ellen Rescinded her invitation.  In effect practicing the same type of social exclusion she claims to be against.

Dr.  Rebecca Fraser-Thill, in her article “Understanding and Coping with Social Exclusion” explains that “when it is intentional, social exclusion is considered to be a form of relational aggression or social aggression.” It can take the form of intentionally ignoring or overlooking someone, overt shunning such as not talking to someone, or as Thrill states “may be more subtle, such as by spreading rumors about a person so that he/she gradually becomes rejected.”  In Ellen’s case it took the form of public shame and a rescinded invitation.

It’s her show and technically she has that right, but I wonder if by doing so she hasn’t sent the wrong message about what tolerance and inclusion is really all about; especially when you consider the fact that a critical component of inclusion is an effort to ensure equal opportunities for all. It is an intentional process of creating conditions designed to enable all members of society have full access to participate in the civic, social, economic, and political activities, of life.

I love the 1970’s show All in the Family.  As a child I did not understand why my black parents would watch and laugh at what I thought was a racist show.  I was too young then to understand the deep complexity of the writing.  Archie Bunker believed in the WASP way.  He believed in separation of the races and all that crap about the white race being the right race.  Archie Bunker had strong opinions about what he thought was right and he was often challenged on those opinions by his liberal son-in-law.  They argued and fought like cats and dogs, but this could only happen because Archie tolerated Mike’s opinions.   Despite their differences, he allowed Mike to live with him and Edith, even though in doing so it meant Archie would have to be uncomfortable-A LOT!

Yet, it was the pull and push between them that made the show so interesting.  As the show progressed we witnessed both Mike and Archie grow, and change, and become MORE accepting of each others opinions and beliefs. Did they come to agreement on everything-absolutely not?! But they did learn to respect each other’s boundaries and more importantly-they began to love one another.

Isn’t this what we want the end result of true tolerance to be about? Can that even happen in today’s era of political correctness?

Carol M. Swain in her article for the American Dissident wonders the same thing.

Any statement that makes a member of a “favored” group feel uneasy is quickly branded as hate speech or bigotry without any real effort to consider the validity of the statement. When issues are addressed, it is usually in a forum of like-minded individuals, where speakers preach to the fawning choir. This is unfortunate. Little effort is expended on bringing real balance to conversations about significant issues. (Swain 2015 p 1)

“Avoidance is not deliverance.” -Horace Arnold

you-cant-tolerate

So what I am saying is this.  Yes Ellen had the right to cancel Burrell’s appearance, but my question is why waste an opportunity to cross a divide and show the world what true tolerance and inclusiveness looks like? I fear that when a person preaches tolerance and inclusion, then fails to act upon that belief simply because of pressure from another group of people-then they have become no better than that which they claim to rail against.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I think if the invitation had been a personal invitation to Ellen’s place of residence it would have been totally appropriate to rescind the invitation if she felt that strongly.  I’ll be honest; I would not knowingly invite a bonified hooded Klansman into my home. But her show is not a private residence.  It is transmitted over public airwaves, paid for through sponsors, and viewed by a wide segment of the population-a population that deserves to have a show that reflects the various segments of society who watch the program. Yes, there are Christians who think homosexuality is wrong, who watch Ellen’s show.  Why?  Because they like the show and they think Ellen is a gifted comedian.  Keeping the invitation open, despite personal feelings would have been a grander gesture and promoted the true culture of tolerance and inclusion we should always strive for.

UPDATE!

sowing-my-tearsMarion Witcher, author of Sowing my Tears Reaping His Joy and founder of New Hope for Special Needs has agreed to guest blog a counterpoint to the above post.  As a journalist I strive t0 be fair and balanced in my writing so when a follower post thoughtful and engaging commentary that presents another view I will invite them to guest blog in more elaborate detail.  In my conversation with Marion, she agreed with the general ideas presented by the post, however she felt in this particular situation Ellen made the right call.  I look forward to reading Marion’s full post and I also invite anyone else who has another way of looking at this incident to contact me as well.

Resources

Fraser-Thill, Rebecca. “Understanding and Coping with Social Exclusion .” Verywell. August      31, 2016. Accessed January 05, 2017. https://www.verywell.com/what-is-social         exclusion-3288013.

Swain, Carol M. “Tolerance, diversity, and inclusion doesn’t include you!” The American  Dissident, Spring-Summer 2015, 11+. General OneFile (accessed January 5, 2017).       http://ezproxy.liberty.edu/login?url=http://go.galegroup.com.ezproxy.liberty.edu/ps/i.do            p=ITOF&sw=w&u=vic_liberty&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA432807567&sid=summon

&asid=b1f36baa221c912b95d54928027186ae.

 

 

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Ellen Rescinds Kim Burrell’s Invitation to Appear on Show and The Culture of Fake Inclusion

  1. Marion Witcher

    Lena, I find your perspective interesting in regard to Kim Burrell being a guest on Ellen’s show. However, in my opinion, Ellen was correct not to allow Burrell to appear on her show. My feelings stem from an experience that I had years ago at my firm. A female minister that I knew– hired me to help her develop some materials for the local National Day of Prayer. During the office visit, she mentioned several topics that they would be praying about. When she mentioned the topic of praying for homosexuals, she became particularly loud. I asked her to quiet her voice—and reminded her that we were in a professional environment.

    Before we knew it, there was a knock on my office door from an employee in the engineering firm on the first floor. He let her know that he could hear what she was saying. My client apologized. However, when the employee left my office, she sat still, then looked at me and said, “Someone needed to hear that word!” I reminded her that it was an office environment and that he that winneth souls is wise (Proverbs 11:30).

    In Burrell’s case, who can say that she would not go on Ellen’s talk show and be equally inappropriate during the broadcast. I say this because with my own ears, “I heard Burrell make a vulgar reference to the male anatomy as she attempted to make her point about homosexuality in a church setting. Her X-rated reference would be considered vulgar by most parents who choose to train their children in the nuture and admonition of the Lord. When she mixed her flesh with the preaching of the Gospel, she prevented many of the people that Christ died for from wanting to get know him in a personal way.

    So whether or not we approve of Ellen’s lifestyle, she is justified in exercising “her” conscience as it relates to Burrell’s controversial appearance on “her” show. In the same token, Burrell is justified in holding on to her beliefs whether someone agrees with her or not. Personally, I am praying that she comes to understand that her vulgar references conflict with the effectiveness and interfere with spreading the good news to ALL people. For Christ sake, we must put a watch tower on our tongue when delivering His message!

    In Matthew 11:28-30 Jesus said, Come unto me, “ALL” ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.

    Like

    1. Marion. Thank you so much for your well written and thoughtful comments. I would love it if you would consider writing a guest blog as a counterpoint to my post. You made some statements that are valid and I would like it if you would elaborate a little more than what the comments allow. I especially appreciated your desire to balance the need for tolerance, with the need for mutual respect on the part of Christians and how Christians should not “mix flesh with the preaching of the Word.”

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s